What Is Attempt?
An attempt is committed when someone intends to commit a crime and takes some steps toward committing it, but ultimately fails to commit the crime. The defendant must therefore have both the necessary mental state of intent to commit the crime, and must do some overt act.
How much of an overt act is required?
That depends on the facts of the particular case.
For example, say someone intends to murder the victim, gets a gun to commit the crime, and puts himself in position to take a shot. The victim walks within sight, and the attempted murderer pulls the trigger. If the shot misses, or if the gun jams and never goes off, the victim gets away, safe and sound. Or maybe the bullet hits but does not kill. The shooter would have committed attempted murder.
That's an obvious example. The perpetrator took every step up until the actual killing. But what if the perpetrator did something less? How much must be done to qualify as an attempt? Is planning or preparation enough?
It is not necessary for the perpetrator to take the last step before committing the crime itself, as in the example above. However, mere preparation or planning to commit the crime is not enough.
In other words, if the intended murderer above bought the gun and planned how he was going to commit the murder but never actually took steps to commit the killing that is not enough for an attempt. This is true even if he really wanted to kill the person.
The reason some "direct and unequivocal" act is required is to make sure we do not convict someone of a crime merely because they had bad thoughts. Thinking about killing someone or wanting to kill someone is not a crime.
Both a mental state (or mens rea), and a physical act are required to commit a crime.
To commit an attempt, the perpetrator must do something more than prepare or plan the crime. He or she must do something to put the plan into action.
How much of an overt act is required?
That depends on the facts of the particular case.
For example, say someone intends to murder the victim, gets a gun to commit the crime, and puts himself in position to take a shot. The victim walks within sight, and the attempted murderer pulls the trigger. If the shot misses, or if the gun jams and never goes off, the victim gets away, safe and sound. Or maybe the bullet hits but does not kill. The shooter would have committed attempted murder.
That's an obvious example. The perpetrator took every step up until the actual killing. But what if the perpetrator did something less? How much must be done to qualify as an attempt? Is planning or preparation enough?
It is not necessary for the perpetrator to take the last step before committing the crime itself, as in the example above. However, mere preparation or planning to commit the crime is not enough.
In other words, if the intended murderer above bought the gun and planned how he was going to commit the murder but never actually took steps to commit the killing that is not enough for an attempt. This is true even if he really wanted to kill the person.
The reason some "direct and unequivocal" act is required is to make sure we do not convict someone of a crime merely because they had bad thoughts. Thinking about killing someone or wanting to kill someone is not a crime.
Both a mental state (or mens rea), and a physical act are required to commit a crime.
To commit an attempt, the perpetrator must do something more than prepare or plan the crime. He or she must do something to put the plan into action.
|
"Attempted murder requires the specific intent to kill and the commission of a direct but ineffectual act toward accomplishing the intended killing."
-People v. Perez, 50 Cal. 4th 222, 230 (2010) |
If the perpetrator has taken a direct step, and stops or is stopped by someone or something from carrying out the crime, he or she is still guilty of attempt. If, however, the person decides to abandon his or her plans before taking a direct step, that person is not guilty of an attempt.
For example, if the intended murderer above set himself up in a position to kill the victim, then changed his mind before firing the shot, he would still be guilty of attempt. He would have taken every step necessary short of the final ultimate act of pulling the trigger.
If he abandoned his plans shortly after buying the gun, however, he would likely not be guilty of attempted murder. (Depending on what exactly the perpetrator did to plan or prepare, he may still be guilty of some other crimes, like possession of an unregistered firearm, for example.)
The specific facts of any case must be evaluated to determine whether the defendant did enough to constitute an attempt.
For a discussion of how someone can commit murder if the person dies but may not be guilty of attempted murder if the person lives, check out this post.
Sign up to get your FREE Writer's Guide: Top 7 Mistakes Made by Writers of Crime, Mystery and Legal Drama.
Learn about the differences between murder and manslaughter.
For example, if the intended murderer above set himself up in a position to kill the victim, then changed his mind before firing the shot, he would still be guilty of attempt. He would have taken every step necessary short of the final ultimate act of pulling the trigger.
If he abandoned his plans shortly after buying the gun, however, he would likely not be guilty of attempted murder. (Depending on what exactly the perpetrator did to plan or prepare, he may still be guilty of some other crimes, like possession of an unregistered firearm, for example.)
The specific facts of any case must be evaluated to determine whether the defendant did enough to constitute an attempt.
For a discussion of how someone can commit murder if the person dies but may not be guilty of attempted murder if the person lives, check out this post.
Sign up to get your FREE Writer's Guide: Top 7 Mistakes Made by Writers of Crime, Mystery and Legal Drama.
Learn about the differences between murder and manslaughter.
